It
came toward the end of the Tuesday night debate sponsored by the Chicago Urban
League, and was the event in which Rauner tried to make a direct appeal to
African-American voters to dump the Dems and not hold it against him that he’s
a Republican.
ALTHOUGH
WHAT LITTLE public reaction there was during the debate at the DuSable Museum
seemed to be more sympathetic toward Quinn than toward anything Rauner had to
say.
By
and large, the candidates seemed to use the typical rhetoric of this campaign
cycle. Having followed the process of multiple campaign events and statements,
there wasn’t anything that was said Tuesday that I hadn’t heard before.
So
excuse me if I don’t think either candidate did an exceptional job of grabbing
the mood of the electorate and gaining its support for themselves.
The
talk about the minimum wage did delve into comic relief, as both tried to claim
to be the one who would seek to get higher wages for the lowest-paid of our
state’s citizens.
RAUNER
SAYS HE’D back a minimum wage hike if there were at least three pro-business
measures enacted into law. While Quinn reminded us of Rauner’s past opposition
to the idea, and claimed he’s the only candidate who’s not about to put
conditions on the idea of bolstering the minimum wage from its
already-exceeding the level of the federal minimum wage.
Which
is why countless people living in Northwest Indiana communities along the
Illinois/Indiana border commute to work in Illinois – they’ll get paid better.
Then
again, Rauner is a business-oriented person who’s more concerned about the
management, rather than the working stiffs.
And
as far as Rauner’s attempt to lambast Quinn, I’m sure he thinks video of that
moment will somehow become viral – being played over and over and over again on
YouTube.
BUT
THERE’S FAR too many goofs in government across the country for Quinn to be
notable in that way. It just made Rauner look like a blowhard (although, to be
honest, Quinn has more than his share of moments during his political life when
he has been just as full of himself).
So
what does the debate mean? It probably did little more than bolster WBBM-TV’s
ratings by attracting government geeks to watch Channel 2 rather than reruns of
M*A*S*H during the 6 o’clock hour.
And
it probably proves that Quinn was correct when, earlier in the day Tuesday, he
said, “”You can’t presume anything until the day of election.”
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment