Much is being made of the many millions of dollars
being spent by Bruce Rauner toward his own campaign for governor (some $9.6
million, with more likely to come in the next three months).
Yet I couldn’t help but notice the latest study from
the Better Government Association, which focused on the amount of money Rauner
is donating to other Republican candidates.
AFTER ALL, WHAT good does it do him to be governor
if it turns out he has a hostile General Assembly and other high-ranking
statewide government officials.
Rauner could easily find himself outnumbered by
Democrats within state government. Unless you think that he and Illinois
Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka can be a new GOP dynamic duo and take on the mass
of state government all by themselves!
Hence, he’s kicking in significant amounts of money
to Republican organizations across the state. Which probably makes more sense
than backing individual candidates.
Those organizations are the groups that know the
local lay of the land and are capable of getting local GOP candidates in higher
office, where they would become allies to a “Gov. Rauner,” should we wind up
with that concept come next January.
THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES published a new Better
Government Association study that reviewed the Illinois State Board of
Elections records of Rauner’s campaign contributions.
This year alone, he has donated 119 contributions to
75 groups across the state.
Since 2012, he and his wife have donated about $1.5
million – compared to the period from 1998 to 2011 when the couple’s campaign
contributions totaled only about $1.1 million.
Interestingly enough, some of that money wound up
boosting the various re-election bids of now-former Mayor Richard M. Daley and
also to Forrest Claypool – remember his bids to dump Joe Berrios as county
assessor?
HE’S GIVING MONEY to the various rural county
organizations, along with various suburban township groups. Even the Chicago
Young Republicans got a bit of cash – according to the study.
Although the one that amazes me is a series of
contributions coming from the “Citizens for Rauner” organization that is giving
money to the Illinois Republican Party proper.
That organization has become so weak and ineffectual
in recent years that somebody has to do something, unless the one-time “Party
of Lincoln” is willing to abandon “Honest Abe’s” home state for good.
It seems Rauner’s campaign fund gave the state party
some $750,000 each during both August and July, along with $525,000 during
June.
TWO MILLION BUCKS during the summertime leading up
to the serious campaign activity that usually kicks off with the coming of
Labor Day.
Not that Rauner’s and Quinn’s efforts thus far haven’t
been serious. It’s just that so many people don’t really pay any attention
until next month – which is why it is possible to legitimately question all
those polls showing Rauner administering a serious butt-whuppin’ to Quinn.
They also contain so many undecideds that we really
don’t know what is going to result come the evening of Nov. 4.
Although I couldn’t help but notice the latest
fund-raising pitch I received – an e-mail message Monday from the Quinn
campaign’s manager.
IT TELLS US how Democratic campaign intelligence, so
to speak, has learned of incidents where Rauner thought he was privately
telling Republican partisans that he’s prepared to push for government shut-downs
if he winds up having to govern as a Republican with a whole lot of Democratic
Party colleagues.
Reformer my butt!!! That kind of talk is nothing
more than trying to return to the past of Newt Gingrich (remember when they
were amazed they got blamed rather than Bill Clinton because of a shutdown?).
Or as Quinn people remind us, of the nonsense we saw in Wisconsin a few years
back when Gov. Scott Walker decided to get all hostile with organized labor –
regardless of the problems his actions caused for people.
Of course, the Quinn people want us to kick in our
own campaign cash to back him, “… to make sure Rauner doesn’t get the chance to
make good on his threats.”
Which is why Rauner would like to have a few more
friends in politically prominent places. That might be the ultimate reason to
think about voting against him come Election Day.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment