By
that, I’m referring to the Chicago Sun-Times, which in their (not-quite-so)
thick Sunday editions used their front-page to make a big deal of the Asiana
Flight 214 crash that killed some and injured dozens.
UNDER
THE BOLD headline FRIGHT 214, we got
a subhead offering what were then the current numbers of 2 dead and 181
injured, and a large photograph of the airplane wreckage – particularly the top
of the plane ripped right off.
Nobody
is complaining about a graphic display of a San Francisco airport crash in a
Chicago newspaper – it was a big-enough story that newspapers, broadcasts,
Internet sites and other forums everywhere all were making a big deal out of
it.
But
to the Asian American Journalists Association, the problem lies within that
headline. They see it as some sort of mocking parody of the way someone of an
Asian ethnic background might speak English.
They
see it as a mocking of the people who were on board that jet – did they think
they were on Fright 214 to San Flancisco? (And yes, that would be racist, if
not for the fact that I wrote it only to mock those idiots who actually think
people talk like that).
THE
OUTRAGE IS intense enough that Jim Kirk of the Chicago Sun-Times got to issue
his first apology as publisher – saying there was no intent to mock or offend
anyone. “We were trying to convey the obviously frightening situation of that
landing,” Kirk said, in a statement made public by the association.
I’m
inclined to give the newspaper the benefit of the doubt solely because, like I
conceded up front, I didn’t even notice it.
When
I saw the newspaper front page on Sunday, I glanced at the headline and
actually read it as “Flight 214.” I didn’t notice it as a pun. I quickly turned
to the inside pages to get actual details.
It
wasn’t until early on Monday when I noticed a couple of threads on Facebook
that I learned there was anything resembling a controversy. It was only then
that I went back to the newspaper, read the headline, and realized I had
mis-read it.
IF
IT REALLY was an attempt to mock someone’s accent, then yes, it would be
offensive.
Yet
I can’t help but think that this is more a matter some something stupid, rather
than racist!
It’s
a silly headline; and one that exposes the potential danger that lies within
any attempt at puns – there are bound to be people who mis-read them. Of
course, there always are those who mis-read something, regardless of how
precisely it is worded.
Some
people just don’t comprehend well under any circumstance. While others, like
me, might race through it a little too quickly. I missed the attempt at a pun,
and just took it for an unimaginative headline.
SO
I’M NOT all that offended by the Sun-Times on Sunday. I’m more of the sentiment
that the paper that day was unimaginative – and perhaps not worth the $1.75
($3, if you live outside the Chicago-area) that was paid for a copy.
If
there’s anything that offends me, it is the new layout structure that turns
Page 3 (which ought to be a prime page for display of significant news) into a
full-page advertisement.
I
doubt the American Mattress ad brought in enough money to compensate for the
fact that it now feels like all the news is buried back in the depths of the
newspaper.
That is something every newspaper ought to be extremely concerned about.
Because that’s exactly the kind of thing that makes potential readers think
they’d be better off reading something else.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment