Do we get all-Chi World Series in ’16?

Perhaps I’m just too much of a cynic, or most definitely not the idealist dreamer that comprises Chicago Cubs fans. But I’m certainly not amongst the ranks of people already making late October plans for a World Series to be played entirely within the city limits of the nation’s greatest city.

Who'd have won if Chicago had got ...

Yes, I already hear some people speculating about the notion of the American and National league champions being the two Chicago ball clubs, which would make for the first all-Chicago World Series in 110 years.

AFTER ALL, THE two teams currently with the best records in their respective leagues are the Chicago White Sox and those ragamuffins who typically stink out the joint at Clark and Addison – but this season haven’t been quite as awful as they usually are.

I just can’t get into the baseball fantasies yet, because there’s still plenty more time. We haven’t even hit the Memorial Day holiday, which is the one-third point of the baseball season.

That’s usually the point at which we can look at the standings and decide if a team or two got off to a good start. Any sooner is just ridiculously premature.

Of course, two first place teams on the day we pay tribute to those who gave their lives to fight for this nation’s principles (including the idea that baseball itself is the national pastime) isn’t any guarantee. There’d still be time for a collapse.

IT’S JUST THAT I can see all the ways in which this could fall short and plenty of time to do so. I read a recent commentary figuring out the many millions of seconds during which Donald Trump could right his campaign fortunes and wind up the winner.

That would also mean nearly as many millions of seconds in which either, if not both, of our city’s ball clubs could figure out a way to blow it big time!

 

... an all-Chicago World Series some 39 years ago?

Heck, I still remember 1977 (the summer I was 12, which is an age many figure is when most baseball fans get their permanent mindset established about the game).

I remember the Independence Day celebrations including talk of an all-Chicago World Series. I remember the month of July ending with both Chicago teams in first place.

TWO-THIRDS OF the way into the season, and both teams were World Series-bound, in our dreams. Yet by mid-August, both of them were out of it. In fact, I recall the Cubs collapsed badly enough that it took an end-of-season win streak just for the team to finish the season at 81-81.

As for those “South Side Hit Men” White Sox, they’re probably the best third place team ever that only hard-core fans have any memory of; and even then mostly because their two big bats of Richie Zisk and Oscar Gamble both fled the team after a single season.

There also were those years of 2003 and 2008 when both Chicago teams were in first place in September, and the Cubs actually won division titles (for what that’s worth) both seasons. But the Sox fell apart in the final weeks of ’03.

And as for ’08, both teams may have went to the playoffs. But both of them getting knocked out in the first round means that Tampa Bay and Philadelphia got the bragging rights of a World Series appearance that season.

IT’S WAY TOO early to dream with any seriousness of a City Series becoming the World Series. No matter how much people in this city would crave such an act.

Having the Chicago Cubs win their first National League championship since 1945 would be something that team’s fans would crave.

And the resulting World Series defeat at the hands of the White Sox  (with pitcher Chris Sale getting the victory in the final game against Jake Arrieta) would only add to that team’s loser aura – while also creating a South Side victory parade that would put the ’05 celebration to shame.

  -30-

Was Chicago ever really that white?

There’s a new piece of video now publicly available for those people who want to rant and rage about Chicago race relations and just how segregated a city we really are.

The Chicago Film Archives took a nearly 15-minute promotional film and put it on YouTube – so we can now see how the city’s establishment wanted to view itself back in 1977.

NOW I WAS 12 years old back in that year – notable because it gave us Michael Bilandic as mayor (whose reputation hadn’t been whacked by snow yet) and actually had a “July 31” with both the Chicago White Sox and Chicago Cubs in first place and many fantasizing about an all-Chicago World Series.

Richard J. signature, even though he was gone

Of course, that didn’t happen. Now, the Internet is filled with assorted people complaining about the distorted image that film gave of the city as a whole.

After watching the film myself (the DNAInfo.com website for Chicago published a feature Friday about it), I have to admit my initial reaction was to wonder how a city that was roughly split equally between white and black people (and not quite as many Latinos as there are now) could appear to be so white?

Then again, I think back to the mentality of the era and remember how little attention official Chicago paid to the South Side neighborhoods that had in the mid-to-late 1960s developed majority African-American neighborhoods.

Despite all the South Side Hit Men homers ...

ALMOST AS THOUGH they had sunk into a black hole when all the white people left places like South Shore or Gresham to live in suburbs like Oak Lawn or South Holland.

So the idea that the people who shot the video for the film sponsored by the Chicago Convention & Tourism Bureau and the Illinois Tourism Bureau naturally looked for images of white people is predictable.

The part of the film where then-WBBM-TV news anchor Bill Kurtis narrates copy talking about Chicago’s diversity gave us footage of all kinds of people in ethnic garb – and several intense seconds of a Greek belly dancer in a particularly-skimpy costume.

There were shots that look like they came from Chinatown, and also some footage of Asian ethnics who appear to be a part of a tourist group – as though these “foreigners” were checking us out (and also spending their money in Chicago).

... '77 was just a 3rd place finish

WHICH WAS KIND of the point of this whole exercise.

In fact, the only signs of black people I saw was one quick glimpse of a taxi driver, and an extended sequence of a parade with black people as spectators and participants.

Which makes me think it was from a Bud Billiken Parade from the early 1970s – check out all the afros (the hairstyle) amongst the male participants.

Then again, that wasn’t the only sign that this was the era following the Age of Aquarius, but prior to the Reagan Years.

MANY PEOPLE WILL laugh about the presence of “discotheques” and the sight of so many white people trying to “get down and boogie.”

Although what I noticed was the idea that few of those people had any real dance moves. They were just sort of waving their hands about and trying to writhe and wriggle in time to the music.

The film “Saturday Night Fever” really was a fantasy in terms of the idea that anyone looked like John Travolta’s “Tony Manero” character. At least as far as Chicago was concerned.

As far as those people who were ranting on Friday that the film was “too white,” I’d have to say that this is the image of Chicago that Richard J. Daley would have wanted the world to see.

Then the latest models, now most likely scrap metal

IT WAS ALSO the image many white Chicagoans had of their city – which is why there were so many people who were thoroughly, and utterly, shocked on that day in the spring of 1983 when Harold Washington actually won a Democratic primary election for mayor.

We are better off for acknowledging the larger Chicago; a city where white, black and Latino are headed toward parity, with a sizable Asian population as well.

Although I can’t help but think that whenever I hear people complain about Chicago being too dominant (Gov. Bruce Rauner made such comments earlier this week) over the rest of Illinois, I wonder if they’d have less of a problem with that concept if the city were more truly like this decades-old PR image in the video.

  -30-