Showing posts with label Peter Silvestri. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Silvestri. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Pols can be such jock-sniffers

It never fails to amuse me the way political people who derive such pleasure from making other people quiver and quake in their presence turn to mush whenever a professional athlete comes into their presence – even indirectly.

That was the case with the Cook County Board on Tuesday, which included among its business for the day a measure praising Philip Humber.

HE, OF COURSE, is the Chicago White Sox pitcher who recently threw a perfect game (as in he got everybody out, which isn’t as easy as it sounds) against the Seattle Mariners.

Which gave the political people who prevail at the County Building a chance to relish in the aura of baseball. Even those who don’t usually think of themselves as fans of the White Sox.

“As a North Sider, I reluctantly support this,” said county board member John Fritchey of the Lincoln Square neighborhood. “But as a Chicagoan, I wholeheartedly support this.”

Which may be the one time that baseball brings Chicago together. It usually is the force that splits the city into two – while we wait for the coming of summer training camp and the Chicago Bears to get us all rooting for the same side.

OF COURSE, THERE also were some gags by the political people, with board member Jeff Tobolski of suburban McCook claiming that board member John Daley “made me” co-sponsor a resolution supporting a White Sox player (a testament to the influence the Daley name will still carry in political circles).

Then, there was board member Peter Silvestri of suburban Elmwood Park, who says that if Daley really wants to get on his good side, he’ll give him the Daley family season tickets at U.S. Cellular Field so he can see a ballgame.

In short, it was a lot of love for a ballclub that is struggling to keep its record somewhere around a .500 winning percentage. Then again, the Chicago Cubs are struggling to avoid embarrassing themselves every time they take the field this season – so anything is an improvement.

What amuses me about this resolution is that it really is evidence that the Cook County Board is lagging behind in throwing its love behind Humber.

ON THE DAY that he pitched the best ballgame of his professional career (and possibly the only thing he’ll be remembered for as a ballplayer), Humber got a congratulatory telephone call from Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Which is unique in that Emanuel is one of the few political people who’s willing to admit he personally could care less about the game.

The following day, Humber got “the call” from President Barack Obama, whom the White Sox like to refer to as their “first fan” on account of the fact he adopted the ball club when he moved to Chicago and adopted the Hyde Park neighborhood as his “home.”

State government went another step further in that Gov. Pat Quinn went so far as to declare that last Saturday (April 28, to be exact) was Philip Humber Day across Illinois – even in those parts of the state that are deluded enough to care about the St. Louis Cardinals.

SO IN A sense, where has the county been? Some of us were starting to think they were being “un-American” in not getting behind Humber with a superficial gesture meant to make it look as though they actually care much about the sport – even though a part of me suspects that most of them wouldn’t go to a ballgame unless someone gives them complimentary tickets.

Well, maybe Daley would go, as we’ll have to see whether his desire that Humber, “pitches like that the rest of the year” actually comes true.

And for what it’s worth, the answer is “no.” Humber himself didn’t show up at the Cook County Board meeting on Tuesday to get a copy of the “resolution suitable for framing” that pays tribute to himself.

I suspect that, being he works at a “job” that involves night games and odd hours, Humber was sleeping in late to be ready for what turned out to be the White Sox victory over the Cleveland Indians.

  -30-

Monday, November 14, 2011

EXTRA: Sox or Cubs; which ballclub's fans drink heavier at the ballpark?

You never know where or when a ‘Sox versus Cubs’ debate can break out. Sometimes, it even occurs during a Cook County Board session.

Such was the case on Monday when the finance committee convened for a serious session to review a series of tax increases being considered to balance the county budget for 2012 – ones that county Commissioner William Beavers of the South Side denounced as “poor man’s taxes.”

ONE OF THOSE increases involves a boost in the alcohol beverage tax – the retail sales of beer, wine and assorted spirits. Which invariably will get passed down to the consumer by those who have to pay it.

That includes the people who feel the need to buy a beer (or four) whenever they attend a sports event live.

Which caused county Commissioner Jeff Tobolski of LaGrange to say that he thinks many people will wind up just paying the extra tax without complaint – mo matter how much more in price it makes the cost of a ballpark beer.

“I’m sure it won’t be dry at the stadium,” Tobolski said, adding that he was including, “the Cell (U.S. Cellular Field), Cubs Park (Wrigley Field) and the stadium (Soldier Field)” in his assessment.

APPARENTLY, COUNTY COMMISSIONER Peter Silvestri of the Northwest Side is one of those Cubs fans who has never called his ballclub’s ballpark “Cubs Park.” Because he quickly snapped on Tobolski for excluding the Wrigley Field crowd, whom he implied are much heavier drinkers.

“I’d bet there is more beer sold at Cubs games than at the Sox,” he said. Which sounds like “fightin’ words” to someone like me who is old enough to remember the days when the old Comiskey Park was informally referred to as, “the world’s largest outdoor beer garden.”

All of which caused county Commissioner John Fritchey of the North Side, who considers himself a Cubs fan, to retort, “you know why they sell so much beer at the games. I say that reluctantly.”

It makes sense.

IF I ROOTED for a ballclub where a 100-loss season was always a very real possibility, I’d probably need to imbibe in the alcoholic beverages a tad too much myself.

Then again, there are times when I watch political people at work who manage to make the most basic issues overly-complicated to the point where I feel like I could use a shot or two to recover.

  -30-