It
was about a month ago that I, while having lunch with some former work colleagues,
made the bold prediction that the Chicago Tribune would wind up eating crow and
endorsing Donald Trump’s presidential bid.
It
really is the trend this time around. “Don’t Vote for Trump!!!” Which makes me
wonder how many would-be voters would feel compelled to listen. I suspect the
minions who are backing Trump will react with revulsion. Just like at the
Dallas Morning News, which said that its “Vote Hillary” endorsement resulted in
significant subscription cancellations!
JOHNSON: Trib pick for prez |
It
was made clear by the newspaper back during the primary that Hillary Clinton
was not an acceptable option. In fact, the newspaper back in March dissed the
entire Democratic Party primary process and anyone who was looking there for
national leadership.
THE
ONE-TIME “WORLD’S Greatest Newspaper” actually backed Marco Rubio in the
Republican primary even though it was already clear by that point that Trump
was well on his way to securing the GOP nomination.
I
figured that since they had so clearly rejected Clinton as an option, they’d
have to find some rhetorical way of taking back their Trump hostility. Probably
something along the lines of the need to support someone who’d back conservative
Republican principles and pick GOP operatives to handle the actual work of
governing. Which is something that Hillary certainly won’t do.
Well,
it seems I was off a bit. While most newspapers, including the Los Angeles
Times that shares Tribune ownership, and the Chicago Sun-Times, are begrudgingly endorsing Clinton (the
Arizona Republic out in Phoenix says she’s the first non-Republican they’ve
ever backed for president), the Tribune had to figure out its own way of being
different.
The
Chicago Tribune on Friday let word get out that they are officially backing the
presidential aspirations of Gary Johnson, He’s the former New Mexico governor
who has the Libertarian Party’s nomination for the Nov. 8 general elections.
IT
SEEMS I was right in thinking that the Tribune would not be able to get in line
with the concept of “President Hillary Clinton.” But the Tribune, which calls
Johnson “a principled option for U.S. president,” is now the newspaper of
choice for those political malcontents who wish they could cast idealistic
votes.
Will Republic readers care more about coupons? |
Although
I find it humorous that the people most anxious to find an alternate political
party are going out of their way to ignore Jill Stein and the Green Party. None
of that liberal freakish nonsense for them.
They’re
willing to ignore the portions of libertarian ideology that says laws against
narcotics use, restricting abortion and a military draft are bad (on the
grounds that government shouldn’t be involved in such things) because they like
the idea that firearms restrictions, public schools and taxes, in general, are
equally abhorrent.
Natl. Enquirer picked Trump during primary season |
That’s
what the Tribune has thrown its lot in with, at least for this election cycle.
Come 2020, they’ll be back in bed with the Republican Party – which, I suspect,
they were looking forward to rejoining this election cycle following two terms
of bringing itself in line with backing Barack Obama.
BECAUSE
I’M PRETTY sure the Tribune made that decision largely because they knew their
readership would revolt if they had dared to go against the hometown boy – even
if he was really born and raised in Honolulu (with a stint of his childhood in
Malaysia).
As
it is, Hillary Clinton (if elected) would be the first Chicago-born U.S.
president. But she went out east to college, then followed her husband to
Arkansas. Meaning she wrote us off, so they can justify writing her off as a
hometown girl made good.
Oddly
enough, the Tribune may have got one-upped in their attempt to gain public attention
for their Libertarian endorsement.
Because
it seems the Detroit News made the same selection, publishing an editorial
that, like many other newspapers, apologizes for not picking the Republican for
president this election cycle after generations (143 years, to be exact) of
having done so.
THEN,
THERE WAS USA Today, which came up with its own editorial that didn’t tell us
who to vote for. It said we should NOT vote for Trump; calling him “unfit for
the presidency.”
Johnson doesn't know 'Allepo?' Do voters know either of these guys? |
There
are very few newspapers (such as the Santa Barbara News-Press) willing to
publicly pick The Donald as their endorsed candidate. For two of them – the New
York Post and the New York Observer – it can be argued that those publications
have relied on Trump’s boorish antics for so many years to generate their news
copy that they need a Trump presidency to create stories.
Something
has to fill all that otherwise-white space in the paper that goes around the ads
for testosterone-production pills that run on Page 17.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment