To
listen to the conservative ideologues, a vote for Gov. Pat Quinn is a vote for
higher taxes, while a ballot cast for Republican nominee Bruce Rauner is one
for lower taxes.
WHICH
IS ABOUT as overly-simplistic and inaccurate a way to view the matters
confronting Illinois government these days. Which is also why Rauner himself is
likely to use that rhetoric over and over, while using all that personal wealth
to buy broadcast airtime to try to ensure that it gets pounded into our brains
by Nov. 4.
What
I’m really getting at is that reality is much more complex than the campaign rhetoric
we’re going to hear from Rauner, and Quinn for that matter. This is likely to
be the first of several commentaries I will write in coming months to try to
help people realize the complexity of the state’s situation.
Then
again, there will be some voters who will desperately look for the simplest
possible explanation – and way of thinking – they can come up with.
Whether
they will turn out to be a majority is something I can’t even guess at. We’ll find
out the morning of Nov. 5, and in the days thereafter.
THE
RHETORIC WILL focus around the $35.7 billion budget for state government’s
fiscal year beginning July 1.
There
are attempts at saving money through various fiscal gimmicks such as delaying payment
of certain bills and maintaining certain expenses at current levels – even though
state officials realize more money is needed.
But
state officials admit that what will happen is there won’t be enough money to
cover all the expenses for state government running through June 30, 2015. Next
spring, when the General Assembly tries to put together a budget for 2015-16,
the shortfall will be worse.
All
because the ideologically-motivated did not want to extend the income tax
increase that was approved a few years ago, and has a Dec. 30 expiration date.
GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS WILL go into this campaign cycle saying they did nothing that would
result in the higher income tax rate remaining in place next year. Of course,
they also did nothing to balance out a state budget for the year.
What
is likely to happen is that when the General Assembly returns to Springfield
for its fall session in November (in the weeks following the general election)
is that legislators will have to consider the issue all over again.
They
could make the kinds of cuts that would devastate public education and social
service programs. Or they could wind up passing some sort of increase extension
for the income tax.
It
would have been more honest if they would have just “bitten the bullet,” so to
speak, now instead of later.
THERE
IS A third option, which is always possible if Rauner actually succeeds in
winning (he’s building up a lot of organized labor and public education
interests who view that option as evil incarnate for Illiinois). The
Legislature could do nothing come November.
But
then that would be dumping the whole mess into Rauner’s lap. Considering this
is the candidate who absolutely refuses to tell us anything specific about how
this financial mess can be resolved (preferring to symbolically repeat over and
over “Pat Quinn is a Bad Man!!!”), it would serve him right to have to address
such a problem on Day One.
But
it would also be bad for Illinois as a whole.
Regardless
of where one stands ideologically, I have to say I find Quinn’s talk throughout
this whole issue to be much more honest than the campaign crud we’re getting
from Rauner.
QUINN
HAS BECOME the stuffy ol’ doctor trying to force-feed us that bitter,
nasty-tasting medical concoction that really will make us feel better and be better
off in the long-run.
So
what will happen come Nov. 4? Will patient Illinois spit the vile mess in the doctor’s
face, then try to pat ourselves on the back because the “medicine,” like the
lack of an income tax reduction, was yucky?
Or
will we swallow, and start the healing process that could result in our state’s
fiscal health actually being restored someday?
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment