I was amused to read an Associated Press account about the fact that a federal
judge lifted a series of restrictions meant to ensure that government jobs
weren’t given out purely as rewards for political work.
Who you know may not be enough to land a job at Chicago's City Hall anymore -- that was the story's lede. Do you really believe this to be true?
EXCUSE
ME FOR being skeptical, but there’s always going to be a degree to which people
hire those with whom they are most comfortable, and to whom each election cycle
will mean the coming of new blood – largely because the old blood will have
lost their political sponsors in the electoral posts.
Besides,
we do have to admit that much of the old, incredibly blatant, ways of
government hiring have gone by the wayside. A new generation that just isn’t
inclined to be so obedient just to get a job has come in.
Personally,
I view the lifting of Shakman Decree restrictions as being merely an
acknowledgement of that fact. The blatant problems are over. But the more
subtle ones are not, and likely never will be.
What
we have to be less concerned with is less about who “sent” someone for a
particular post, and more about whether government work (“the people’s
business,” as some cynical pols refer to it), actually gets done.
BECAUSE
MUCH OF the work done in these clerical jobs is stuff that could be done by
many people – including the ones who got the jobs because they happened to know
somebody.
There
are times I wonder if the people who complain the loudest are the ones who are
jealous that the only people they know capable of “getting them” a job are ones
who work in a gas station, and not some sort of pseudo-cushy political posts.
If
they had the right contacts, they’d suddenly be all for the old system.
And
yes, I have to tell you that many of these jobs can be mind-numbing in their
own right. If not for the perspective that you’re doing work for the public,
nobody would want many of these clerical posts.
BECAUSE
ANYBODY WITH any real intelligence who works within government either has some
sort of serious dedication to the public good (more intense than you’d see in a
police officer or social worker), or else they wind up leaving to make much
more money in the private sector.
Now
I suppose I should say that I once got a government job because of who I knew.
It was back when I was in college and I needed a job for the summer. It turned
out I knew someone who knew then-Rich Township Democratic Committeeman Lee
Conlon.
It
also turned out that Conlon and I had both attended the same university. So the
next thing I knew, I was showing up at the office of then-Cook County Assessor
Harold “Bus” Yourell, whose chief of staff had but one question for me.
Literally,
it was “Who sent you?” That was my only qualification for a summer’s worth of
work in the basement recording land transactions in giant ledger books (the
county hadn’t yet fully computerized such information, so the books still had
to be kept up to date).
I
CAN’T SAY any of my colleagues were particularly qualified for the job. Then
again, I don’t think anyone out there would have done any better than we did
that summer.
Even
if I was, theoretically, just a political hack who was eminently replaceable.
Do we really want a government operated by somebody, even if they have no real qualifications or skills, that anybody sent?
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment