QUINN: Knows who his friends are |
Emanuel
said so to Crain’s Chicago Business, where the Associated Press then picked up
on the report – disseminating it into little space-filling briefs that appeared
in newspapers across the state.
CONSIDERING
THAT QUINN appears to be the only candidate of consequence who will seek the
Democratic Party’s nomination for governor in the 2014 election cycle, what
choice does Emanuel really have?
The
fact that Emanuel said he and Republican gubernatorial hopeful Bruce Rauner
have serious disagreements about politics and government’s role in our society
doesn’t mean that the two are in a mortal feud that cannot be resolved.
The
two are friends of a sort, because Emanuel is the type of Democrat who has his
comfort level with the corporate set and doesn’t view them as life-long
enemies.
If
anything, Emanuel has always had his problems with the segment of the
Democratic Party that relies on their government officials to defend their
liberal social ideals.
JUST
AS RAUNER’S problems in the primary is going to come from the large swath of
GOP voters who want to have elected officials who will turn the government into
an entity that will uphold their socially conservative ideals over all other
people in our society.
The
fact that the two men use differing political labels (the “D” versus the “R”)
doesn’t mean they wouldn’t find ways to work together. A “Mayor Emanuel” may
well find he’s more comfortable with a “Governor Rauner” than he has ever been with
Quinn.
But
the mayor is giving the official backing to Quinn because of the party label.
EMANUEL: Backing Quinn publicly. But privately? |
But
it is just talk if it doesn’t come with the mayor using his political muscle
and strategically conniving mind to come up with ways to turn out the Chicago
vote en masse for Quinn.
WE
COULD EASILY get an election cycle where Emanuel doesn’t do a thing to
undermine a Rauner campaign – which could result in it having a chance to gain
support against a Quinn re-election bid!
It
is kind of reminiscent of the 1998 election cycle in which then-Congressman
Glenn Poshard got the Democratic Party nomination for governor, but never
erased the public perception that then-Mayor Richard M. Daley was more
comfortable dealing with George Ryan – who went on to win that particular
election.
Could
Quinn get the same private undermining that Poshard got? He barely won a
majority of the Chicago vote for governor, which allowed Ryan to prevail with
the more traditional vote in GOP-leaning parts of the state!
Now
Quinn and Poshard are hardly alike. Ryan and Rauner also are extremes.
BUT
THE POINT being that an endorsement proves the accuracy of the axiom “Talk is
Cheap!” Just because Emanuel publicly says he’s not opposed to Quinn does not
mean he really is all that enthused with the idea of having him as governor for
the rest of his time as mayor.
For
Emanuel definitely seems to view the political set-up the way other public
officials do – that state government is meant to be subservient to the
interests of local government and that a governor ought to be interested in propping
up Chicago so that its problems don’t spread over to the state as a whole!
On
casinos alone, Quinn has been unacceptable to that viewpoint.
It’s
also good to see that Quinn seems to realize that his allegiance with Emanuel
only goes so far.
FOR
IT WAS reported on Friday that the governor has a new person on his staff to
help deal with communications and his public image.
RAUNER: Emanuel's real backing? |
That
person is Stephanie Gadlin, who until now has been the spokeswoman for the
Chicago Teachers Union. As on the public mouthpiece for union boss Karen Lewis –
the outspoken (in her own right) critic who has made her distaste for Emanuel
well known.
I’m
sure a lot of the things that Gadlin has said publicly about Emanuel were
influenced by her employer.
But
if Emanuel’s support for Quinn turns out to be fairly lame, at least the
governor will have someone on his payroll (whether the state or the campaign)
who won’t blush at the thought of saying something nasty about Rahm-bo.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment