RAUNER: Has he lost? |
That
issue has been tied up for nearly the past two months – ever since state
government passed a budget for the current fiscal year despite Gov. Rauner’s
objections. Rauner, feeling the need for a political victory over urban
Democratic interests, continued to fight on with this issue – even though it
created a potential situation where schools might not have the money on hand to
open on time.
PERSONALLY,
WHEN I first heard the Republican legislative talk, my suspicion is that this
was some sort of political talk by which GOP interests claimed a deal that didn’t
really exist – then would try to blame Democrats for failure when nothing wound
up happening.
You
might think I’m being politically paranoid, but I’m not alone in being
suspicious.
Several
education administrators I have spoken to have said they’re equally suspicious –
saying they’re not going to believe a deal is in place until they actually see
the governor sign something into law.
One
school board president I know went so far as to say that while he was convinced
Republican and Democratic legislators were in agreement, there still is the
issue of Bruce Rauner.
“WE’LL
SEE IF his people (Republican legislators) can talk him into going along with
this,” that official said.
For
the record, legislators aren’t really willing to say what their deal is – other
than that much of the funding that was to be provided to Chicago Public Schools
to cover pensions for retired teachers will be restored. That despite Rauner’s
efforts to use his amendatory veto powers to remove it from the education
funding bill that was passed by the Legislature back during the spring.
For
what it’s worth, Mayor Rahm Emanuel says he is pleased with the deal, as it
provides the city school system with what it desired. “That, and more,” he told
reporter-type people.
MADIGAN: Can he complete deal this weekend? |
Whereas
Rauner said in his prepared statement he “applauds” legislators for working
together. Although the Chicago Sun-Times wrote in its report that the
legislative agreement did not include any of the collective bargaining changes
that are supposedly the reason why the governor has been so ridiculously
stubborn with regards to the budget and education funding.
SO
IS IT possible that Rauner, who has never made a secret of the fact that he
desires changes in state government structure to undermine the influence of
labor unions, really will wind up coming out the big loser – with legislators
feeling the need to keep state government functioning and the public schools
open more than they need the financial support he’ll be providing to GOP
officials in next year’s election cycle.
The
key will be to see what happens on Sunday. For while legislators have met just
about every day this week to discuss the issue, we’re now at the point where
their staffers (the government geeks who actually know how to write
legislation) are taking the grand concepts of the agreement and turning them
into the legal language of a bill.
Things
could still fall apart between now and then. But officials say that if a bill
is crafted without anyone feeling like the other side is trying to pull a
last-minute, double-cross (that’s really the way political people think!), then
a vote could come Monday.
Our
long state nightmare could finally be over. Or maybe?
BECAUSE
WE’LL STILL have to go through the upcoming 15 months before the 2018 general
election, and I don’t doubt that at this point, Rauner is desperately searching
for a publicity team to replace the ideologue twits he recently fired to help
him figure out the proper spin for his actions.
Nixon 'nightmare' over, is Ill. budget one too? |
Rauner
is likely to go into a re-election campaign being unable to say he accomplished
much of anything, and was actually the cause of much of the “state nightmare”
that may well be an Illinois equivalent of the “long national nightmare” that
then-President Gerald Ford alluded to upon the resignation of Richard Nixon.
We’re
likely to see a governor who overplays the regionalism card (urban vs. rural
voters) and who banks his re-election chances on one gamble.
That
the Democratic Party gubernatorial candidates wind up bungling their efforts so
badly that they hand a second term at the Statehouse to Rauner, all
gift-wrapped. Which isn’t completely out of the question, if you want to be
honest.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment