The high court's justices chose not to get involved in budget issue -- right now |
That’s
about the best way to describe the current situation with regards to Illinois
state government – nothing is really resolved, and the political brawling will
draw out for as long as Gov. Bruce Rauner and the legislative leaders are so
inclined.
FOR
THE LEGAL status quo is that there are cases in the courts for Cook and St.
Clair (the Illinois suburbs of St. Louis) counties; which have shown a tendency to go in differing directions on
the issue.
The
state’s high court rejected a request by the Illinois attorney general’s office
to immediately get involved and decide which court got the issue right – Cook when
it said state workers could only get a federal minimum wage while the budget
battle is ongoing, or St. Clair which said labor union contracts mandated
payment of pay checks.
So
now, the Cook County case will have to be appealed through the legal system to
the appellate court in Chicago, while the St. Clair case will work its way
through the appellate court in Mount Vernon.
Only
then, will the Illinois Supreme Court get involved – although I suspect they’re
hoping the two appeals courts wind up coming up with rulings similar enough
that there’s no need for the Springfield-based court to get involved.
Will Bilandic Bldg. justices agree ... |
THIS
ISSUE HAS come up because Rauner wanted state workers to get their salaries
even though the Illinois Constitution clearly states that money cannot be spent
on anything government-related if the state doesn’t have a balanced budget in
place for the current fiscal year.
Because
angry state workers would be quick to blame the governor for their lack of
receipt of paychecks (or direct deposits into their bank accounts, if they
prefer).
That
would have given Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and the others in the
Democratic Party caucuses that run state government some serious leverage in
their desire to prevent Rauner from using his gubernatorial authority to push
forth some seriously anti-labor union-related measures.
... w/ Mount Vernon-based counterparts on payroll issue? |
Instead,
the Supreme Court rejected taking action that would have imposed his desires,
and political observers are proclaiming a Rauner “victory” because the courts
didn’t dump all over him and the state workers got paid.
BUT
ANYTHING IS possible. What happens if these cases work their way through the
legal process (instead of being rushed through with an instant political ruling
like Madigan wanted) and the Supreme Court ultimately decides that the Illinois
Constitution literally means that no money can be spent on government (not even
salaries) until a budget is in place?
Do
we wind up getting a contempt ruling issued against the governor AND his state
comptroller – who was the one who sought the St. Clair court ruling that she ultimately
used to have legal authority to make the salary payments?!?
The
sad thing is that with the way the political people have dug in their heels
over this budget – which really has nothing to do with finances and has become
completely about who gets the political upper hand – there’s a chance that the
legal process could take its usual meandering pace and there STILL won’t be a
budget in place for Illinois government.
RAUNER: Won Round One, as did all of Rocky's opponents |
I’ll
also have to admit to being disappointed that the state Supreme Court chose not
to act on Friday.
BECAUSE
THE REALITY is that the only way the state’s budgetary battle is going to be
resolved is for some higher entity to administer a swift kick to the behinds of
all our government officials.
Consider
that Madigan earlier this week said it’s possible that the final budget will
not be something negotiated by all the political parties – but is something
that gets forced down one side’s throat.
And
I doubt that Madigan envisions any scenario in which he is the one who has to
swallow something that has the vile taste of anti-labor union attached to it.
Even the courts realize that too many people will revolt if something like that
happens.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment