But
for someone who claims he’s being revolutionary and shaking up the way things
are being done in this state, his tactics seem so retro. So repetitive of the
past.
HOW
ELSE TO view the appearances the governor made Monday in Marion and Belleville?
Both of which are Southern Illinois communities whose legislators are of the
Democratic Party persuasion.
They
are part of the majority that is so large that Democrats can literally ignore
Rauner’s rhetoric. They can override anything the governor chooses to veto –
which ultimately puts the power of government in the hands of Illinois House
Speaker Michael Madigan and state Senate President John Cullerton, both Chicago
Democrats.
So
how does Rauner try to overcome a Legislature that is stacked against him? By
trying to change this from Democrat vs. Republican to Chicago vs. the rest of
the state.
Trying
to make it so that those non-Chicago area communities that have Democratic
Party representation will bolt from following their legislative leaders and
choose to back him instead.
TURNING
THIS INTO an urban vs. rural brawl could work amongst some people. After all,
much of the reason that former Gov. Pat Quinn didn’t get re-election was the
perception among some Illinoisans that they wanted a rural-oriented leadership
within state government.
But
if that attitude had truly been prevalent in 2014, then Rauner never would have
won the Republican primary to begin with.
Which
is why I believe that if Rauner is truly to be successful, he’s going to have
to be more broad-based in his appeal than to be the governor of rural Illinois.
And I don’t think tactics like the ones he used on Monday are going to accomplish
that.
Rauner
made a point of criticizing the local legislators in Marion and Bellville (a
St. Louis-area suburb) to, “stand up for taxpayers instead of Speaker Madigan
and President Cullerton.”
AMONG
THOSE WHO came under criticism Monday were state Sens. Gary Forby of Benton, Bill
Haine of Alton and James Claybourne of Belleville, along with state Reps. John Bradley
of Marion, Brandon Phelps of Harrisburg, Jay Hoffman of Swansea, Jerry Costello
of Smithson and Daniel Beiser of Alton. Not exactly like-minded, identical
communities.
Yet
all the rhetoric is generic. The Southern Illinois and St. Louis-area
legislators are being treated as an anonymous lump by the Rauner backers.
Which
sounds so much like the accusations that Raunerites are making about the same
legislators – that they’re acting like generic Chicago-type pols. I have always
found that line of logic to be so laughable.
Unless
Rauner really believes that the only way for them to think independently is for
them to behave in lock-step unison with the business-oriented thought process
he’s trying to impose on all of Illinois.
SO
RAUNER IS trying to split the Democratic caucuses in the Legislature based on
geography – hoping to isolate Chicago and its inner suburbs which account for
about 45 percent of the state’s population and which has made it clear on many
occasions that it has no support for the trash that Rauner talks.
Which
may be the strength that legislators in opposition to Rauner may have to being
able to remain firm to their principles and not be forced to give in to the
guv.
There
are a lot of people who have their own ideas about what constitutes reform, and
they all have a right to be taken into account.
The sooner the governor realizes that fact and the notion that is way is not the only way to achieve reform (and a balanced budget), the sooner the nonsense talk will come to an end at the Statehouse in Springfield.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment