Mayor
Rahm Emanuel’s attempts to get something approved by state government fell
through because Pat Quinn wasn’t going to knee-jerk approve something just
because city officials wanted it.
HE
ALWAYS HAD his own concerns about expanded gambling opportunities and the wishes
of some political people to count on casino tax revenues to try to resolve
government financial problems.
It
was always readily known that there was no love lost between Quinn and Emanuel
when it came to gambling issues.
So
much so that some people speculated that Emanuel wouldn’t be the least bit
upset if Quinn were to lose his 2014 electoral bid. Particularly since there
was some sort of personal friendship between Emanuel and Bruce Rauner.
It
is with that dynamic in mind that I have to admit to being amused that Quinn’s
defeat does not seem to have opened up the chances of a casino coming to
Chicago any time soon.
VARIOUS
NEWS REPORTS indicate the issue has been discussed in recent weeks. Rauner is
being non-committal as to whether he’s willing to sign off on a gambling measure
that the General Assembly would have to give approval to first.
In
fact, it would seem that Rauner is throwing out hints that he’s going to demand
political support from Emanuel and other Chicago political people for many of
the ideological measures HE wants to see passed into law.
Including
the “turnaround agenda” that the governor tries to describe as a reform of our
state’s economic condition but is really nothing more than a batch of measures
meant to bring Illinois as close to being a “right to work” state as it ever
could be.
Because
the reality is that Illinois isn’t Mississippi or Alabama. Heck, we’re not even
Indiana – even though I’m sure people living in places like Danville or
Effingham wish we were.
CHICAGO
OFFICIALS ALREADY have made it clear they’re not backing “turnaround,” refusing
to pass the symbolic resolutions that Rauner is asking municipal governments
across Illinois to support.
In
fact, our city and county officials have gone just the opposite – letting it be
known we’re among the hard-core opposition to measures meant to undermine the
ability of organized labor to look out for its interests.
Now,
Rauner is hinting (if not coming right out and saying) that he expects a little
bit of support for his ideological measures, or else he could become more of an
obstacle than Pat Quinn ever was to the long-standing gambling dreams that
Chicago has had.
Personally,
I don’t care if Chicago ever gets the casino some believe is an absolute
necessity to our future. I’d like to think Chicago offers so much in the way of
amenities that it’s not necessary.
FOR
THE SAME reason that we don’t see Chicago trying to become the location of a
state prison facility, I’d like to think we don’t need a casino. We’re above
that!
But
the politicking for gambling is so intense that I doubt the issue will ever
wither away. There are those who just aren’t going to be happy until they can
go play Blackjack or roulette without having to pay the cost of a trip to Las
Vegas – or, if they’re the type of frequent gambler that Vegas loves, lose so
much while gambling that the casino comps the cost of their trip.
Particularly
if this does wind up being the issue that develops an Emanuel/Rauner split and
keeps much of anything from getting done.
It
would be the ultimate laugh if gambling wound up becoming the issue that made
many of us wish we could have Pat Quinn back as governor!
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment