That’s
certainly what happened during Monday night’s debate between Mayor Rahm Emanuel
and challenger Jesus Garcia when a reporter-type person from WGBO-TV (the
Univision affiliate) tried to inject immigration reform into the forum held by
them and sister station WMAQ-TV.
THE
QUESTION WAS to what degree the candidates would have the city provide
financial support for a lawsuit meant to benefit those non-citizens who have
lived the bulk of their lives locally, but can’t take advantage of in-state
tuition rates to attend college.
Emanuel
made a point of emphasizing the fact that his proposal to allow all Chicago
Public School graduates with at least a “B” grade point average to attend a
City Colleges of Chicago school free of charge (no tuition) would be applicable
to those young people lacking U.S. citizenship.
No
word about what those people are supposed to do once they complete the
community college level and try to transfer to a four-year college. But Emanuel
– often a target of Latino activists on immigration issues – tried to make it
seem as though he offered something specific to those youth.
Garcia,
however, rebutted by pointing out that Emanuel in his positions in the Clinton
administration and as White House chief of staff under President Barack Obama guided
those presidents from taking too much of a stand on immigration policies.
EMANUEL
CERTAINLY WAS right that Republican opposition certainly would have jumped down
the Clinton and Obama throats for pursuing such policies. Although it’s not
like the lack of action made those officials any GOP allies.
I
don’t know if I agree with Garcia that if Emanuel had been more aggressive in
pursuing immigration reform back then, we might not need some of the more
drastic steps that Obama has since tried to implement via the executive order
route.
But
you have to admit that Garcia also managed to avoid the question that was put
forth to the two politicos.
And
none of us have any more specific knowledge of where the candidates stand on
immigration policy than what we knew prior to the political debate.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment