Far in lead financially, for time being |
We
have one guy who’s more than capable of self-funding his campaign, yet he seems
to want us to think that he’s actually raising the nickel-and-dime donations
from the general public, so as to create the impression that people like him,
they really, really like him!
BECAUSE
IF WE truly comprehended just how wealthy Republican nominee Bruce Rauner was
(he wasn’t exaggerating with that self-description of being in the 0.001
percent of society), we might actually think less of him.
We
might figure that for all his money, he should find something better to do with
his life than try to buy a government office.
Then,
we have another guy who’s going to go out of his way to brag and boast about
every dollar he manages to raise.
Because
the perception some people want to have is that Gov. Pat Quinn is such a schnook
that he can’t possibly come up with the kind of campaign cash to be competitive
against Rauner’s personal wealth.
THE
BOTTOM LINE is that we have two truly different men, and we have a clear-cut
choice when we have to make our pick Nov. 4 as to who will be the chief
executive of Illinois government.
Which
has me wondering if Rauner, deep down, would like to proclaim himself the CEO
of Illinois, rather than using such a mundane title as “governor?” But that’s a
debate for a different day.
I
make this observation in part after seeing the statement Rauner’s campaign
released earlier this week about his campaign finances for the first three
months of 2014.
RAUNER: Carhartt coat appeals to 60 percent? |
Rauner
highlighted the fact that 60 percent of the people who made donations to his
campaign were individuals who gave $100 or less. In short, the Joe Schnooks of
the world who decide to make some sort of symbolic political statement – rather
than coming up with the kind of cash that gets a political person’s serious
attention.
BUT
WHEN ONE considers how much more money the remainder were donating, it makes
that 60 percent majority seem so insignificant.
In
fact, with Rauner raising not quite $9 million during those three months, it
should be donated that $5.3 million were the donations Rauner – a venture
capitalist who turned himself into an extremely wealthy man – made to himself.
That’s
the part Rauner doesn’t want us to look at. In his best “Mighty Oz”
impersonation, he tells us not to look behind the curtain that contains his
personal checkbooks.
All
I know is that while I do have a personal interest in public policy and
government, if I had that kind of wealth, I could think of a lot more
worthwhile things to spend the money on than trying to win an election.
THEN,
WE GO to Pat Quinn. He’s the guy who had about $5 million raised previously,
and raised about another $5 million during the past three months. Not bad for a
guy who’s going to have a larger percentage than “60 percent” of Joe
Schnook-type guys making campaign contributions for him.
The
Chicago Sun-Times, however, pointed out what may be the intriguing part of the
whole equation. Both candidates began the second quarter of this year far
apart.
Rauner
spent so much money to win his primary that his campaign account had about $1.3
million on April Fool’s Day, while Quinn had $8.8 million to work with. Largely
on account of the fact that he didn’t have to do a thing in order to beat
Democratic challenger Tio Hardiman.
Quinn
is loving it these days, now that he’s the “big money” guy – although not
really.
Would either candidate actually live here if they win? |
FOR
RAUNER HAS the kind of personal wealth that he can give himself yet another
loan to catch up to that $8.8 million. And Quinn is going to have to start
spending that cash in order to rebut all the knockdown allegations Rauner will
try to offer up against him.
Although
I’m sure Quinn will have his own share of political bodyblows – as I’m sure the
labor union political action committees will be more than anxious to keep Pat
adequately funded to cope with Bruce.
Which
means the next seven-plus months will be headache-inducing, what with all the
nonsense we’re going to hear spewed by the candidates and their lackeys toward
each other.
The
only winners? Those people who get their joy after Election Day from
calculating who spent the most money per vote they actually receive! Even money
on whether Rauner will be the big winner, or the most foolish man ever to try
to get into Illinois politics, come Nov. 5!
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment