Will Walgreen's lengthy Chicago-area history help it keep business if tobacco products actually become an issue? |
I have to admit to being somewhat amused this week by the announcement by CVS that they will stop selling cigarettes and other tobacco products later this year.
It
has me wondering if the business battle between newcomer CVS and long-time
Chicago-area pharmaceutical retailer Walgreen’s will now turn to trying to gain
a business advantage concerning those people who need to have their daily dose
of “smokes.”
WILL
CVS NOW try to claim a high moralistic attitude because they won’t sell
cigarettes? Will they be the start of a trend in which the sight of all those
racks of cigarette packs and cartons behind the cash register will become
obsolete?
Or
something you only see in a seedier sort of business?
Is
that what Walgreen’s is destined to become? Since the Deerfield-based retailer
indicated this week they do not plan to follow suit on cigarettes.
They’re
adopting the line of logic used by convenience stores, gasoline stations and
other businesses that include tobacco products on their shelves – they add to
the financial bottom line in a way that can make the difference between being
profitable or going out of business altogether.
HOW
FAR WILL Walgreen’s be prepared to carry this decision out? Because they certainly
want to be taken seriously in terms of health care issues.
In
fact, there are those industry analysts who contend that CVS’ decision to drop
cigarettes from their stores is less about a high-minded moral statement and
more about a bottom-line business decision.
As
in they can make more money ultimately by having various clinics, vaccination
services and other health care options in their stores – services with which
the sight of cigarette cartons would just be too much of a clash!
Personally,
I don’t smoke. I never have. Just something about the smell was always so
unappealing that I never felt compelled to try.
WHICH
MAKES ME not so much appreciate a business that doesn’t encourage smoking, as
much as dislike a business that does.
I
have way too many memories of getting stuck in lines waiting to make a purchase
because the person right ahead of me either can’t make up their mind what brand
of cigarettes they want, or (more often) are getting all worked up into a
frenzy that demands to see a store manager because the sales clerk can’t figure
out which of the variety of brands it is that the customer wants.
Invariably,
it winds up being a small purchase I was making (sometimes, as little as
purchasing a newspaper or two – yes, I still prefer ink on paper to this
format).
Which
makes such a purchase a bigger deal than it has to be!
THERE’S
ALSO THE case that I currently live at a place with both a Walgreen’s and a CVS
store within three blocks of me. I can’t say I favored either one of them in
the past.
But
I may well have to start spending more money at the CVS if this tobacco sales
issue actually becomes a controversy.
Because
I’m sure the people who want to view their cigarettes as some sort of civil
rights issue (never mind the real issues of our society) will be more than
willing to make a stink about this – and not just because their clothes and
breath reeks of inhaling too much tobacco fumes throughout their lives.
There
are times when I wonder if people are willing to “fight to the death” for their
cigarette habit as intensely as those who are making an issue of “concealed
carry. Perhaps it’s the same people – a cigarette pack in the shirt pocket and
pistol tucked in the hip.
OR
MAYBE A cigarette pack and pistol tucked in the purse?
While
the rest of us consider fighting for issues that really matter in our daily
lives. Including which place might help us look out better for our health.
Could
that now be CVS?
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment